An analysis of the economics of new nuclear

Extracts from a presentation: The economics of new nuclear build – do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Nuclear Free Local Authorities, Welsh Forum Seminar 25th, November Ceredigion County Council by Dr Paul Dorfman

Construction costs

  • 10 years ago industry forecast cost $1000/kW – so cost of 1600MW plant like EPR $1.6bn
  • 2004: Olkiluoto ~$3000/kW
  • 2007/08: US utility estimate $5000/kW
  • 2008/09: Areva/Westinghouse bid for Ontario, S Africa, UAE >$6000/kW

Costs

  • 2008 White Paper & NPS assume £1250/kW or $2000/kW
  • In 2008, E.ON said cost 70% higher than government
  • Estimates before construction always under-estimate
  • Why does government think industry will build UK reactors at 40% of price charged elsewhere?

So…

  • Nuclear construction cost assumptions are gross under-estimates
  • More realistic assumptions on construction cost and cost of borrowing  would triple the expected kWh cost

And EPR construction experience?

  • July 2010, Areva announced losses of €367m on the Olkiluoto contract, originally priced at €3bn, but now estimated at €5.7bn.
  • EPR Flamanville: EDF confirmed the project was running two years late andincreased its estimate of the cost overrun from 20% to more than 50%.

US pull-out

  • Withdrawal by US EdF partner Constellation Energy from their project to build a French-designed EPR reactor at Calvert Cliffs, Maryland.
  • Constellation forced to withdraw because of ‘high cost of financial support from the US government’.

Waste and decommissioning very expensive

  • £70bn - £100bn liability so far [this refers to liabilities already taken on by the British tax payer following the collapse of BNFLso far…
  • So Government proposal for ‘fixed unit price’ at which Government takes ownership of waste - potentially a subsidy
  • But we haven’t met the ‘Flowers criterion’ from 1976 – no new build until a clear route [or the recommendations of the Committee on the Management Radioactive Waste in 2006]

Geological ‘disposal’

  • Nowhere in the world has intermediate or high-level radioactive waste been safely disposed.
  • GDF R&D required by CoWRM have not been undertaken.

DOWNLOAD the full presentation here

The local issues

Rockhampton resident, Professor Gareth Williams, gives an excellent and concise view of local issues around the proposed development.

Respond NOW

Big decisions are being made that WILL AFFECT YOU

Make sure you know what's going on, register now and we'll keep you informed.

Click here to stay informed ...

Register NOW